A Dot in the Universe...

My photo
are you looking for me? or am i supposed to look for you?

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Naturally Boundless

i found this question in one of the conversations (one of the best conversations i had) i saved last year...

Although love is boundless, why would you define love outside its own natural definitions?

Thursday, December 20, 2007

10:11 PM


the guy i talked to said that he can never get serious with a guy. thinks that thinking of guys makes the person so gay. and he said that it is predetermined that he can't love a guy for his moral conscience will creep into him once he's in a relationship, thus leaving him no choice but to break up...

he believes in love within the boundaries of "social" acceptance or else you'll get rejected or hurt. and you'll feel the pain...

can you first tell me how love is defined naturally?

6 comments:

wanderingcommuter said...

i think no one can definitely define love, kasi the moment you define it hindi na yun love. as the cliche goes, love is abstract. thus, it is relative.

sabihin mo sa guy, huwag siya masyadong mag isip ng malalim para lang majustify ang sarili niyang bias... hahaha. inaway!

Chyng said...

ang hirap ng tanong... at cympre tamad ako isipin ang sagot. after all, you dont need the best definitions to be loved. the more you define it, the more it becomes complicated. Love's just a gift to be enjoyed! ;)

Mugen said...

Basta alam ko, love grows between two people. Hindi ibig sabihin na nagkakasundo kayo't infatuated kayo sa isa't isa'y love mo na siya.

I might be wrong. Twisted ang views ko sa pag-ibig.

Ronnan Tristan said...

Love love love love love....

"Only Heart can define"

Nakaka-inis kasi kahit masakit but still masarap ma in-love.... hehehe

Looking For The Source said...

@wandering commuter :: the moment you define love, hindi na yun love... ano na yun?

ha ha. hindi na kami nakakapag-usap. hihi...

@chyng :: so true. you dont need definitions to love and to be loved. its about doing it.

@mugen :: ouch yang statement mo ha. pero true. how twisted nmn ha?

@ronnan tristan :: that's the fun in loving. the risk and the enjoyment.

hay. love nga nmn.

Looking For The Source said...

@wandering commuter :: the moment you define love, hindi na yun love... ano na yun?

ha ha. hindi na kami nakakapag-usap. hihi...

@chyng :: so true. you dont need definitions to love and to be loved. its about doing it.

@mugen :: ouch yang statement mo ha. pero true. how twisted nmn ha?

@ronnan tristan :: that's the fun in loving. the risk and the enjoyment.

hay. love nga nmn.